DarkBlizz

I don't think that version is working now (after patch 9).
Here is \Liberty.SC2Mod\Base.SC2Data for patch 10 (build 15133):
http://www.mediafire.com/?zfy4dwyyk0z

Thanks! I'm playing with terran and I thought zerg is less protected but now I saw some "zerg" answers. I'm glad to see that good players are not requesting nerfing.
Thanks again for your answers.

If they been revealed, why should take 10 min? Make some AA and take them down. And... don't make their game. If they are just kids enjoy doing this, you have to keep your calm, don't say anything and do your job. If you'll leave the game, they'll doing again because are hoping to be happening again.

Terran can EMP sentrys but zerg is helpless and, till you can do something with it, is knew that Force Field is a little too powerful. A SC1 veteran has recommend to be destroyable (having a life-bar).
What do you think about the idea that sentrys to be build from robotics.
Rushing with FFs to block your ramp and to prevent you expanding in early game or to prevent to save your one of the bases blocking you in the other side are some powerful strategies easily done with some sentrys. If they will be build in robotics, they'll not be warp anymore.
In many Cup games FFs quickly made the match.
I'm just curios about opinion of you all.
 

Indeed, the instant send was funny.

Another intriguing thing is that when he pushes the launch button, he's not releasing the click and, instead, he is dragging the mouse down and it can be saw that the button could be released because of moving off it. That manoeuvre on buttons, in general, is canceling the command (if that button has one).
This match is HvH, that is indubitable, because of lags ("waiting for player") but, like Organize_Chaos said, why that mouse move on the upper left after he launched the game?...
And, by the way, they theoretically played on a local network, that lags was not because of a "crappy internet connection" and was because of that Lan application which is not finished yet.
But, if in reality it was a bnet record, how that lag could be faked? Simple: you can just make high traffic, especially on upload with max speed and you can play on a "crappy internet connection".
I don't want to say is fake because there is no concretely argument but why they always make such horrible videos?
If you really want to help those with no keys to play before blizz will release the game, you'll just release an alpha version if the final taking to long, or the source code. But, all that happening here is delays, delays and delays...

Quote from: klaretos on April 13, 2010, 07:00:42 AM
You are stupid emylgoth. You are implying that Humanik bot is not real? LOL!

I said that?... Holly molly, I can't remember and I guess I need to work more harder on my English... Sorry if I upset someone.
All I tried to say is: release a first version of AI and then discuss it. Don't make such a long propaganda before people know it.
But... do your job, please, with Normal speed, since no one care about that.

No one finding this ridiculous? Is only talking for 4 days now. And your video comments are pretty childish and what is funny is that you almost always wrong type your own AI name "Humanik" but "Strategy" not. Why you're not recording your voice when you're making those videos? Maybe, in that way, you will inspire more reliability to all viewers (or not? ). If you want to have a real support from people here, you should post your first release with at least one race (protoss, I guess) and if it will be liked, people will search for your next releases and comment about it. My advice: don't push to much with theoretical explanations before you have something out.

P.S.
And... when you're recording, please set the game speed to fastest from the beginning...

I'm very impressed... It brings a lot of improvements, nice lates and keeps the gorgeous harassment. I love it. 

Indeed, it gives a very cool effect.

Quote from: DarkZeros on March 12, 2010, 08:25:29 AM
Working on new version. The new one will be multirace ^^

v2.0 eta: 1-2days.

PD: Yes it will be reactive (and not only air reactive)

All races!?... I can't wait, really, cos your toss was much-much better than 5.5.

Quote from: uber1984 on March 13, 2010, 09:02:10 PM

Quote from: TheLeapist on March 12, 2010, 07:58:56 PMThe team option is cool but also kinda useless when the AI isn't smart enough to come help you out when all your units are being destroyed at the front of your base.

That is actually rather realistic... don't believe me? try playing with my brother on your team...


har har

lol 

With harvest ratio 5, this AI is extremely entertaining (to me). You need to be careful all the time. The harassment for this AI is gorgeous (especially on T and Z). I wish you'll continue this project...

Not "video" is fake, this record is real. I guess you can't understand the meaning of "visual only". There are some tools which communicate. What does they say is what programmer write. Any averaged programmer can create those tools to look, react each other and say to you all that outside messages but what's happening inside of coding you can't know. That's why they haven't proof anything in that video. We haven's seen any real communication with the game.
I hope your more evolved brain than mine, can understand now why some people are not happy with their actually "proof".

Quote from: UberB on March 13, 2010, 06:41:55 PM
Stop making maphacks.

It's like you're requesting "stop making cigarettes". Some ppl like to smoke and their smoke affect the others around; you can tell them not to smoke, but you can't ask to stop making cigarettes.  All you can do is to avoid smokers. 
I'm not using cheats. Only explain this phenomenon.