Main Menu
Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - greymanic

#1
Quote from: Gamewiz on March 07, 2010, 01:03:46 PM
Quote from: Ceron on March 07, 2010, 12:08:18 PM
Quote from: Gamewiz on March 07, 2010, 11:06:18 AM
Quote from: Ceron on March 07, 2010, 09:41:18 AM
What's Wrong With Starcraft 2

go check at 2.50 and tell me that blizzard actully putted some effort in it?


That was the stupidest video I have ever seen... Seriously? This guy tried to find the absolute WORST quality videos of SC2 to try and make his point. All the things related to graphics, how much units stand out, etc., are all based upon that ass-quality video? That right there proves how much of an idiot he is, and how much he is stretching to try and make his point, which fails miserably.


you kinda fail to read what i wrote, check 2.50, never told you to watch the whole stupid thing


Sorry, wasn't sure what you meant by 2.50, as it's correctly written, 2:50, so I didn't know you were referring to a time.


I don't really see how that line makes sense though. Terrans can fly, so why have ground units? Same with zerg... Just because Protoss can fly doesn't make the colossus obsolete or something.






Greymanic, go away. No one likes you.

/cry

PS still don't know how to read people's posts I see.
#2
lol. you guys still going at it.  No point argueing dude. Some poeple just really want to fantasize about this game saving their souls or something and get all mixed up in the head if anyone says something realistic.
#3
Talk about irony... I actually got accepted. HA!  I'll probably be playing with Kingdom who personally introduced me to info on starcraft 2's modding tools which I think look interesting.  At least they're giving modders the ability get creative and expand the game in ways blizzard didn't seem to have time for.

Much thanks to darkblizz for the information and hacks to get my feet wet in the interim.  Good luck to others waiting for acceptance.
#4
General Discussion / Re: LAN/Online crazy idea
March 04, 2010, 01:38:31 PM
Quote from: Gamewiz on March 04, 2010, 01:21:01 PM
Unfortunately I have zero knowledge when it comes to programming, so I have no idea if something like this would work... :/

Then why say anything?  Is this your personal blog or something?
#5
General Discussion / Re: Terran smokers -- WHY?
March 04, 2010, 11:57:59 AM
Actually the more responsibility the more stress so I'd like to see marines doing bong hits, 2nd teir laying out coke lines and the flyboys shooting up H.  Then I'd definately buy this game...
#6
Quote from: Gamewiz on March 02, 2010, 03:50:34 PM
Quote from: greymanic on March 02, 2010, 03:40:00 PM

I already stated what I plan to do.  I hear a fucking echo in here and you know what you're the same types on every damn board.  The ones who give blizzard millions no matter how shitty they become and you say the same stupid cliche'd and predictable shit every time someone threatens to pop your bubble--a bunch of sorry little gum chewing emo fuckup, blizzard nazis who think blizzard is god's hand to kiss everytime they shit something out... So have a big shitty hand job call SC2 nutcases!  OH but all this only since WoW of course because your sorry little personalities were molded by that game. You're probably more murloc now than human.

I stated what I did and even if I was the only one, which obviously I'm not, I'd still say it.  It's my opinion, I feel strongly about it and I'm sorry you 2 can't handle it on an anonymous message board without getting all snot-nosed about it and crying yourselves to sleep.


Wow... pot calling the kettle black. Read your post again, very carefully, and tell me who is getting snot-nosed again. Now you are throwing a fit like a little child.


And by the way, I enjoyed vanilla WoW, but haven't played it in years, so again, nice job assuming something that isn't true! You're on a roll with that!

Are you kidding? I'm having a blast.  You're too dumb to know when you're being fucked with while still trying argue sensibly after disqualifying yourself with the first post. 

I thought you were going somewhere?  SO you bullshit which means everything you say about yourself is probably BULLSHIT.  I could care less who you are.  You're the one who took my general post personally which, even though I didn't intend for it to be taken that way, I now find enjoyable considering how you act.

Hard isn't it... trying to get in the last word after embarrassing yourself.  Ok, here, have the last word... try to make it good this time. 
#7
Quote from: Dizmaul on March 02, 2010, 02:47:32 PM
Quote from: greymanic on March 02, 2010, 01:53:54 PM
Quote from: Dizmaul on March 02, 2010, 01:14:13 PM
Im sorry but any1 who is dissapointed by this game could not of been a fan of sc1. I don't care what you say if you loved sc1 you have to love sc2 its just amazing. Ive never heard of people complain about why they didn't make more changes to the greatest RTS ever made. You make it sound like sc1 was some game you played once when you where little and this 1 looks to much like it. Do you not realize sc1 is still being played today (obviously your not one of the people who play), and going from sc1 to sc2 its like night and day. Also for all the bitching i hear about the campaign and how "OMG 3 games to buy how could they hustle us?!?". I played the terran single player at blizzcon. This is not I REPEAT NOT JUST DOING MISSIONS like in sc1. Its a full on redic game in itself and if you dont enjoy the first one DON'T BUY THE SECOND 2.

Bottom line SC2 is amazing in every single aspect thus far. DON'T LISTEN TO THE TROLLS THEY JUST HATE LIFE...

Ok. Being wrong about me not being a sc1 fan is more tolerable considering how wrong you are about the new game.  You do realize you're describing the e-sport koreans... nothing against them it's just many of us don't fall into that catagory.  Thanks for confirming my suspicions that this game is mainly about satisfying e-sport types.  So you're either one of them or think that a great sequel is just about the graphics.  If I'm wrong pray tell me, what makes the difference like night and day?

Suspicions that this game is mainly about satisfying e-sport types?! of course it is and why would it be any other way. Who cares if you like the game, you will stop playing anyways 6 months after release when something "new" comes out, or maybe even sooner when you keep loosing to scrubs on ladder. Im happy they satisfy the people who are dedicated hardcore fans of the e-sport. Which is what has kept the starcraft community alive after you decided in 2001 you where done with the game. If you don't like a serious game like starcraft go play something else.

I already stated what I plan to do.  I hear a fucking echo in here and you know what you're the same types on every damn board.  The ones who give blizzard millions no matter how shitty they become and you say the same stupid cliche'd and predictable shit every time someone threatens to pop your bubble--a bunch of sorry little gum chewing emo fuckup, blizzard nazis who think blizzard is god's hand to kiss everytime they shit something out... So have a big shitty hand job call SC2 nutcases!  OH but all this only since WoW of course because your sorry little personalities were molded by that game. You're probably more murloc now than human.

I stated what I did and even if I was the only one, which obviously I'm not, I'd still say it.  It's my opinion, I feel strongly about it and I'm sorry you 2 can't handle it on an anonymous message board without getting all snot-nosed about it and crying yourselves to sleep.
#8
Quote from: Gamewiz on March 02, 2010, 02:34:47 PM
Quote from: greymanic on March 02, 2010, 02:24:59 PM
No. I'm right in that a lot of blizzard fans think it's shallow.  Just look on any board on the internet including this one.  Remember, I added the disclaimer "unless your long-term conscious and unconscious memory is shot".  I guess that includes you.  Oh wait, you're right, I failed to mention people who are much easier to please than the rest of us--the word "shallow" again comes to mind.   Or maybe you're just offended, like you said, and will talk trash now any way you can. 

Still I was only talking about the shelf-life of the game.  I think anyone could enjoy it for a short time.  People will get bored a lot faster though because as a sequel it's lacking.  I keep repeating myself to you man.  Go back and read my "initial orgasm" comment. wtf?  When the game releases, I'm sure I won't bother you here anymore.

EDIT: Also, I meant move on to where people aren't bashing your poor game... as in this thread ... prickly little guy.


And you are wrong because there are A LOT of people who DON'T think it's shallow. And by your delusional version of logic, somehow a person has a mental disability because they don't agree with you?


Honestly, your stupidity and ignorance here astounds me. You are giving your OPINION, NOT FACT! And I've never said you weren't entitled to your opinion, quite the opposite actually. What I have a problem with is that if someone disagrees with you, you think they aren't entitled to that. You think your word must be law.


And again, you say that you "know" that the shelf life of this game will not be long based solely upon your opinion which you think is fact. You do NOT "know" anything. You can't prove that I will agree with you after this game is out. You don't know me or my personal preferences when it comes to gaming. Stop thinking you can speak for other people.


You are the only one on a high horse here, pal.

LOL.  You did it again.  I said posts ago that it was all my personal opinion. You fail every time.  It's like what else do I have to do to qualify my statements and not be misunderstood by some random dimwit.

Yeah, my opinion but based on obvious common sense given what we should know about gamers and blizzard history.

Forget it.  You act way too young to have been a serious gamer when sc1 was around anyway.  Have fun with the rest of your non-sensical little nerd rage fuckups.
#9
Quote from: Gamewiz on March 02, 2010, 01:59:11 PM
Quote from: greymanic on March 02, 2010, 01:45:45 PM
Oh settle down.  My opinion is just my opinion but yeah, I don't see how any veteran fan can fail to see the shallowness of this game--I never said you shouldn't enjoy it did I?  People always read into shit even when the english is clear as day.  You even mention the single-player game as being innovative which I'd already said. lol.  If anything my comments are just out of place because people are still googly-eyed over it but reality will strike eventually.  J

Just move on if you can't handle it and by all means, enjoy away... "Enjoying" for me used to mean years of enjoyment.  This might last me the length of the single-player campaign.   

I forgot to mention that it's been 10 years.  Waiting 10 years for a sequel like this?  It can only be explained away by the dominance of wow which has lasted way too long. Blizzard has gone down a notch.  OK?  And spare me your righteous indignation which is pretty lame considering you hang out here as much as anyone looking to leech the latest crack.


Clearly I don't think it's shallow if I enjoy the game, that was my point. So my interpretation of your statement was true, even if it wasn't direct. You assumed that all veteran players of blizzard games couldn't possibly like this game, and I proved you wrong.


Just move on? I could say the same thing to you. I'm not moving on because I enjoy the game, and I enjoy what we have here available to us in this community. If YOU don't enjoy SC2, then YOU move on.


And me looking for the next crack in AI is VASTLY different than you S-T-E-A-L-I-N-G the game from Blizzard. I'm not making them lose money. I'm not hacking their multiplayer servers to get an unfair advantage. I'm not cheating. I just want to try their game out because I'm excited for it. The day the game comes out I'm purchasing it and removing all cracks from the game. So yes, I am better than you in that regard, and I'm proud of it.

No. I'm right in that a lot of blizzard fans think it's shallow.  Just look on any board on the internet including this one.  Remember, I added the disclaimer "unless your long-term conscious and unconscious memory is shot".  I guess that includes you.  Oh wait, you're right, I failed to mention people who are much easier to please than the rest of us--the word "shallow" again comes to mind.   Or maybe you're just offended, like you said, and will talk trash now any way you can. 

Still I was only talking about the shelf-life of the game.  I think anyone could enjoy it for a short time.  People will get bored a lot faster though because as a sequel it's lacking.  I keep repeating myself to you man.  Go back and read my "initial orgasm" comment. wtf?  When the game releases, I'm sure I won't bother you here anymore.

EDIT: Also, I meant move on to where people aren't bashing your poor game... as in this thread ... prickly little guy.
#10
Quote from: Dizmaul on March 02, 2010, 01:14:13 PM
Im sorry but any1 who is dissapointed by this game could not of been a fan of sc1. I don't care what you say if you loved sc1 you have to love sc2 its just amazing. Ive never heard of people complain about why they didn't make more changes to the greatest RTS ever made. You make it sound like sc1 was some game you played once when you where little and this 1 looks to much like it. Do you not realize sc1 is still being played today (obviously your not one of the people who play), and going from sc1 to sc2 its like night and day. Also for all the bitching i hear about the campaign and how "OMG 3 games to buy how could they hustle us?!?". I played the terran single player at blizzcon. This is not I REPEAT NOT JUST DOING MISSIONS like in sc1. Its a full on redic game in itself and if you dont enjoy the first one DON'T BUY THE SECOND 2.

Bottom line SC2 is amazing in every single aspect thus far. DON'T LISTEN TO THE TROLLS THEY JUST HATE LIFE...

Ok. Being wrong about me not being a sc1 fan is more tolerable considering how wrong you are about the new game.  You do realize you're describing the e-sport koreans... nothing against them it's just many of us don't fall into that catagory.  Thanks for confirming my suspicions that this game is mainly about satisfying e-sport types.  So you're either one of them or think that a great sequel is just about the graphics.  If I'm wrong pray tell me, what makes the difference like night and day?
#11
Quote from: Gamewiz on March 02, 2010, 12:39:21 PM

I'm sorry, but don't speak for the community of Blizzard fans as a whole, because you are wrong. And I find it insulting that you think I'm not allowed to enjoy this game, even though I have played every game of Blizzards since the first WarCraft.

You are basing your assumption of "lacking in innovation" because of the beta? That's jumping the gun just a little. Their singleplayer campaign, from what they have said, will be very innovating from previous blizzard games. It will be very dynamic depending on how the player goes through the campaign. I for one can't wait to continue to the story and shape it's destiny.

The split into 3 parts bit I really have no comment. Some people think Blizzard is just being greedy, while Blizzard says it's because they want to be able to put alot of effort into each campaign. It's not a game-breaker for me, so I'm still buying all three.

There is no LAN for a very obvious reason. If you have to be online at all times, connected to battle.net, even in order to play singleplayer, then there is NO reason to have LAN. Just log into multiplayer, setup a private match w/ password, and have your friends join in. Aside from a few minority (as one person on here explained to me), who have lan parties without a internet hookup, the rest of the people wanting LAN just want it because they are planning on pirating the game. That's it. And I'm all for the constant connection to bnet. It cuts down on piracy, which is killing the PC gaming community.

Sound and graphics is all based on opinion. I think it looks and sounds great. It's different enough to stand out on it's own, yet has those familiar sounds (yet updated) and music that help it relate to SC1, which I find refreshing.

Thank you for proving my point. Piraters like you I despise. It's people like you who are going to be the downfall of the PC gaming community because of your own selfish desires.

Oh settle down.  My opinion is just my opinion but yeah, I don't see how any veteran fan can fail to see the shallowness of this game--I never said you shouldn't enjoy it did I?  People always read into shit even when the english is clear as day.  You even mention the single-player game as being innovative which I'd already said. lol.  If anything my comments are just out of place because people are still googly-eyed over it but reality will strike eventually. 

Just move on if you can't handle it and by all means, enjoy away... "Enjoying" for me used to mean years of enjoyment.  This might last me the length of the single-player campaign.   

I forgot to mention that it's been 10 years.  Waiting 10 years for a sequel like this?  It can only be explained away by the dominance of wow which has lasted way too long. Blizzard has gone down a notch.  OK?  And spare me your righteous indignation which is pretty lame considering you hang out here as much as anyone looking to leech the latest crack.
#12
Disappointment will vary by age group and depend on how much they played previous blizzard RTS games.  If you enjoyed the previous 3 then after the initial orgasm is over, due to the simple fact that a new blizz game is out, you WILL be disappointed, unless your long-term conscious and unconscious memory is shot. 

No other blizzard sequel has been this shallow and lacking in innovation not to mention what they're taking OUT of this one: same 3 races, no innovations (think of differences b/w war2 and war3), split into 3 parts!, no LAN, a basic patching in of blizz quality sound and graphics but nothing really impressive.  As a sequel it's 90 percent "new bnet" (wooptie do!) and continued story. 

So if you aren't familiar with the old blizzard games then have fun.  This is a great repackaging of those wonderful games.  The rest of us have been left out in the cold since wow but I don't think blizzard cares.  The real blizzard is gone and they've turned into a bunch of milkmaids, milking the new generation of gamers who are ignorant of what they missed in years past. 

It could be the first blizz game I don't buy.  Bnet will be a bunch of zerg rushing, exploiting, ridalin-riddled kids with too much spare time, who only care about stats (think the tragedy that is arenas).  If there's a campaign / LAN crack I'll probably at least download.
#13
Quote from: kewickviper on February 26, 2010, 01:16:02 PM
I know, the game has been finished for a long time now I'd say at least a year. They have had the professionals playing on them for ages, helping with the balancing. The beta is of course just for balancing issues, but I think the main reason for the delay has been the net battle.net. They've completely re-written it from the old one to make it better and I think that's produced a lot of bugs for them to iron out over the last few years.

Right.  Obviously bnet is main reason why it's take so long since this is basically SC1 put on the old WC3 engine with better graphics and some new units.  Compared to any other blizzard sequel the level of innovation is miniscule.  This is exciting and all and it's still blizzard, just not the good 'ol blizzard.  Thanks for the new bnet that's basincally just about making your games harder to crack and gives them more ways to ask for money and virtually has nothing to do with making the game experience better. If I'm wrong, someone tell me what features in SC2 am I missing that makes it leaps and bounds over the previous?  And since we know bnet is the reason for the several-year-delay, what about bnet will make the player experience so much better than the old bnet?
#14
This feels vaguely familiar. Before warcraft 3 release I know there was a leak and crack.  I seem to remember it only allowed building and so on with no AI or networking.  Anyone remember?
#15
Thanks for some real news.  I guess pretty soon we'll all be "playing with ourselves".