Quote from: ProzaicMuze on March 27, 2010, 01:12:26 PMAnd running to insults in the end. Typical.
First and foremost, we're not talking about a logo. [Entry 1] is any graphical modification of the site. That includes everything from the font to the buttons to the borders to the images (and logo). That is what I mean by generalization. You're stating that something is much smaller thus requiring less work. The contest permits that the entry can be as simple or demanding to create as the creator chooses. ItzMattu was stating that [Entry 3] wasn't a fair choice because it was more involved. In actuality, all 3 of the entries can be difficult projects requiring a great length of time to complete. The difference is how much time you CHOOSE to invest.
As far as trying to decide if a contest is profitable or not, I'd suggest you're missing out on the idea behind it. If I was looking for a profitable venture I'd go straight to the source, not create a fun piece with the possible chance of winning something. The operative word being "fun." Is the concept of doing something for fun really so foreign to you that you've reduced life to a balance sheet of profit and non-profit? Not to mention that if you're considering using the possibility of buying a Beta Key (which is against the rules and can get you banned if caught) as a measure of worth you're missing the point entirely.
This thread is about questions and I'm not here to argue semantics with you. I tried to make a positive contribution to remind everyone that the difficulty of submissions is entirely up to those who participate. Either you'll understand what I'm trying to say and stop belittling us for our efforts or you'll continue to troll this Q&A thread.
Either way I'm done with this conversation. I've made my points and those they need to reach will appreciate them.
Also: "Entry 1: Create a logo image for DarkBlizz. Dimensions can be anywhere between 0x0px - 1500x1500px. Be creative, anything goes, animated, non-animated, new motto's, etc."